Someone <a href="https://tutoriage.com/essay-help">help with essay</a> about Socrates. essay “Socrates” Socrates is a classical Greek philosopher, one of the founders of Western philosophy and at the equal time he is frequently known as an enigmatic figure. He is supposed to be born in 469 BC and die in 399 BC. Still some professionals claim Socrates used to be a fictional character, others acquire evidence there was once no need developing him independently, as he made a serious contribution to world philosophy. Socrates considered subjecting our moral beliefs to thru logical check. According to him, unexamined lifestyles is not well worth living. Socrates geared up and participated in public arguments, he scrutinized a person’s beliefs due to a quantity of questions directed toward revealing his interlocutor’s nature. Consequently, he undermined people’s moral superiority irrespectively of their rank both in politics or religion. He spoke with people who had recognition of wisdom and determined out they had been now not in reality wise, in his speech Socrates cited that in contrast to such wise men, he neither knew nor thinking that he knew. At the age of seventy a law-obedient citizen of Athens was once accused of the capital crime of corrupting the childhood with his teachings, as properly as professing his own divinities but now not the gods of the city. Five hundred jurors observed him responsible and sentenced to demise with the aid of poison. He was regarded to be a hazard to established establishments of Athens. At existing it appears evident that Socrates had a danger to refute the costs towards him through undermining the town authorities’ electricity over non secular matters. Actually, there are some controversial points of Socrates’ argument which he makes against Crito, but what is really of great importance is the deliberate choice of the philosopher. It has been widely argued if Socrates made a right choice by refusing to exile or mitigate his punishment. It is somehow understandable why under the conditions of “Athenian democracy” he could not strongly object to the well-established order. Generally, Socrates’ opposition to democracy is often declaimed, and it causes philosophical debates. Some experts suppose that Socrates could not support government that did not conform to his ideal of perfect republic, the Athenian government was far from it. During the last years of the philosopher’s life, Athens turned into “continual flux”, democracy was overthrown by the Thirty Tyrants. Generally, the Laws of the fourth century BC Athens lacked the kind of written in exemption and, putting it mildly, they were imperfect in the contemporary point of view. But still Socrates gave reasons why he preferred to take poison and refused to pursue his philosophical teachings spreading. But judging by his actions and utterances Socrates considered the rule of the Thirty Tyrants less legitimate than the senate that sentenced the philosopher to death. To analyze the fatal decision which could have been avoided one needs to try to penetrate into the atmosphere and consider Socrates’ thoughts before the verdict was read out and mull over his speech in front of the Athenians. According to contemporary scholars, it was not a right choice to accept the punishment and go quietly without fighting for justice. <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socrates">Socrates</a> about Socrates delusion was in absolute consent with the sentence, as he did not question the social contract he conducted with the state, the Law of Athens. Perhaps, he should not have taken the justice of the verdict as a gospel truth. As Saint Augustine keenly noticed, an unjust law is no law at all. According to contemporary views, he could have appealed against the senate’s decision (Southmayd). But this point was contrary to what he believed and defended in his teachings.
I create new theme. Join! Have fun! Look at our example. <a href="https://mcessay.com/">Mс Essay</a> always is happy to give you free advise. Free essay “The Road” by Cormac McCarthy Bekkettiana Pass is the one where a man and a boy collide with an old man tapping along the way with a stick. He claims to know that he will: People have always been preparing for tomorrow. I did not believe it. Tomorrow was not going to prepare for them. He did not even know that they were there. ” In this rare dialogue with a stranger there is a game, even the pleasure of sharing profound platitudes: “Do you want to die? / Not. But I would like to die. When you are alive, you always have it ahead. / Or perhaps you would like you never to be born. / Good. Beggars can not be choosers. / You think it will be too much. / What is done is done. In any case, it’s silly to ask for luxury at such times. ” However, the Irish existential fragrance here (“There is no God, but we are his prophets”) is a bit strong (McCarthy, 181). Thus, the author hints at modern society, which is also aware of its destructive impact on the environment and the devaluation of basic humanistic values and ideals, but people still do nothing to prevent ongoing degradation. In this situation, the current prophets remain unheard by the overwhelming majority of modern society. The same attitude to such prophets, who warn about the impending disaster, can be traced in the book: “There is no prophet in the long chronicle of the earth who would not be honored here today,” the father says, trying to make his son understand why they live in a gray moon landscape . “In whatever form you may say, you were right” (McCarthy, 197). Thus, taking into account all the above, we can conclude that Cormac McCarthy’s novel Road is a warning to modern society. At the same time, the author obviously believes in the survival of<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanism">humanistic</a>ideals and basic human values that distinguish man from all other living creatures that inhabit the planet. The author shows that people can be extremely destructive and, moreover, they can descend to a primitive level to such an extent that they can turn to cannibalism when the question of their survival arises. Nevertheless, people always have hope that there will be at least one truly human person, such as a boy, the main character of the novel, who still remains sympathetic, compassionate and truly human, despite the cruelty of the surrounding world.